Sources:
अजानानं यदि ज्ञानं काष्ठं ज्ञानं प्रसज्यते। तेनासंनिहितज्ञेयं ज्ञानं नास्तीति निश्चयः॥
Why does what is conscious of a colour not also hear it at the same time? [If you argue that] When it has no connection with sound there is also no consciousness of such from that,
གལ་ཏེ་ཤེས་[p.111]Byang chub sems dpa'i spyod pa la 'jug pa rtsa ba dang 'grel pa (1990)
Slob dpon zhi ba lha and Mkhan po kun dpal. Byang chub sems dpa'i spyod pa la 'jug pa rtsa ba dang 'grel pa. Khreng tu'u: Si khron mi rigs dpe skrun khang, 1990. 
ཤིང་ཡང་ཤེས་པར་ཐལ་བར་འགྱུར། ། དེས་ན་ཤེས་བྱ་ཉེར་གནས་པ། །
མེད་པར་ཤེས་པ་མེད་ཅེས་ངེས། །If something that’s unconscious knows,
It follows that a stick has knowledge also. Therefore in the absence of a thing to know,
It’s clear that consciousness will not arise.
You might venture, “It is consciousness without something knowable.”
Then it would follow that even a piece of wood is consciousness. It is definite that there is no consciousness
Without a knowable object being close by. [61]
Si la conscience ne connaissait rien,
Les bûches aussi seraient conscientes ! Il est donc certain qu’il n’y a pas de conscience
En l’absence d’objet connaissable.
Si es consciencia algo que no percibe,
entonces incluso un leño es también consciente. Por lo tanto, si no hay un objeto a ser percibido,
está claro que tampoco habrá consciencia.
If it is consciousness without that known,
Then it follows that also wood is conscious. Therefore one has to say that without proximity of
The object of knowledge, consciousness does not exist.
If there is a knower without a known,
Even a piece of wood would be a knower. Therefore, without being closely associated with the known,
There is certainly no knower.
གལ་ཏེ་ཤེས་མེད་ཤེས་ཡིན་ན། །
ཤིང་ཡང་ཤེས་པར་ཐལ་བར་འགྱུར། ། དེས་ན་ཤེས་བྱ་ཉེར་གནས་པ། །
མེད་པར་ཤེས་པ་མེད་ཅེས་ངེས། །
