Texts Cited in Śikṣāsamuccaya/Query

From Bodhicitta
Quotations the alignment has not caught
Works the curators identified that the segment data does not attribute

The Works Cited page is generated from the translation memory: every segment of the Śikṣāsamuccaya that quotes another work carries a QuoteSource naming it, and the list is the sum of those tags.

That makes the list only as complete as the tagging. This page records what the tagging appears to have missed — works the curators recorded in the hand-written list that the segment data does not attribute to anything.

It is a findings page, not a task list. Each row is a question for a curator, not a defect to be fixed mechanically.

Where the list stands

The alignment now attributes 358 quotations across 78 works. That is up from 61 works: QuoteSource became a page property in September 2026, and the count is no longer limited to works carrying an RKTS catalogue number. The 17 works that had no number are now included on equal terms.

Every one of the Śikṣāsamuccaya's 633 quote segments carries a source. There are no untagged quotations left in the alignment — so anything missing from the list is a question of attribution, not of unmarked text.

17 works the curators named that the alignment does not

These appear in the archived hand-written list but are not the QuoteSource of any Śikṣāsamuccaya segment. Six of them are quoted elsewhere in the translation memory, which tells us the page and the identification are sound and only the attribution in this alignment is absent.

Work Cited elsewhere? What that suggests
Bhagavato bhaiṣajyaguruvaiḍūryaprabhasya pūrvapraṇidhānaviśeṣavistārasūtra not cited anywhere in the translation memory Neither this alignment nor any other attributes a passage to this work. Either the identification needs revisiting, or the passage was never segmented as a quote.
Brahmaparipṛcchāsūtra 7 quotations in BC-Root-Bhavanakrama-3 The work is quoted elsewhere on the wiki, so the page and its identification are sound. What is missing is the attribution in this alignment — the passage the curators marked is tagged to another source, or not marked as a quote.
Sāgaranāgarājaparipṛcchāsūtra not cited anywhere in the translation memory Neither this alignment nor any other attributes a passage to this work. Either the identification needs revisiting, or the passage was never segmented as a quote.
Caturdharmakasūtra 1 quotation in BCA-Com-Great Hum The work is quoted elsewhere on the wiki, so the page and its identification are sound. What is missing is the attribution in this alignment — the passage the curators marked is tagged to another source, or not marked as a quote.
Cundadevīdhāraṇī not cited anywhere in the translation memory Neither this alignment nor any other attributes a passage to this work. Either the identification needs revisiting, or the passage was never segmented as a quote.
Gocarapariśuddhisūtra not cited anywhere in the translation memory Neither this alignment nor any other attributes a passage to this work. Either the identification needs revisiting, or the passage was never segmented as a quote.
Niṣṭhāgatabhagavajjñānavaipulyasūtraratnānanta not cited anywhere in the translation memory Neither this alignment nor any other attributes a passage to this work. Either the identification needs revisiting, or the passage was never segmented as a quote.
Kāmāpavādakasūtra not cited anywhere in the translation memory Neither this alignment nor any other attributes a passage to this work. Either the identification needs revisiting, or the passage was never segmented as a quote.
Mañjuśrīvikrīḍitasūtra 1 quotation in BC-Root-Bhavanakrama-3 The work is quoted elsewhere on the wiki, so the page and its identification are sound. What is missing is the attribution in this alignment — the passage the curators marked is tagged to another source, or not marked as a quote.
Pravrajyāntarāyasūtra not cited anywhere in the translation memory Neither this alignment nor any other attributes a passage to this work. Either the identification needs revisiting, or the passage was never segmented as a quote.
Saptamaithunasaṃyuktasūtra not cited anywhere in the translation memory Neither this alignment nor any other attributes a passage to this work. Either the identification needs revisiting, or the passage was never segmented as a quote.
Bodhisattvagocaropāyaviṣayavikurvitanirdeśasūtra 1 quotation in BCA-Com-Great Hum The work is quoted elsewhere on the wiki, so the page and its identification are sound. What is missing is the attribution in this alignment — the passage the curators marked is tagged to another source, or not marked as a quote.
Suvarṇaprabhāsottamasūtrendrarājasūtra not cited anywhere in the translation memory Neither this alignment nor any other attributes a passage to this work. Either the identification needs revisiting, or the passage was never segmented as a quote.
Tathāgatakośasūtra not cited anywhere in the translation memory Neither this alignment nor any other attributes a passage to this work. Either the identification needs revisiting, or the passage was never segmented as a quote.
Triskandhakasūtra 1 quotation in BCA-Com-Great Hum The work is quoted elsewhere on the wiki, so the page and its identification are sound. What is missing is the attribution in this alignment — the passage the curators marked is tagged to another source, or not marked as a quote.
Vajradhvajapariṇāma not cited anywhere in the translation memory Neither this alignment nor any other attributes a passage to this work. Either the identification needs revisiting, or the passage was never segmented as a quote.
Śālistambasūtra 2 quotations in BCA-Com-Minyak-Ch9, BC-Root-Bhavanakrama-1 The work is quoted elsewhere on the wiki, so the page and its identification are sound. What is missing is the attribution in this alignment — the passage the curators marked is tagged to another source, or not marked as a quote.

What we need from you

For each work above, one of three things is true, and only a curator can say which:

  1. The passage is in the text but tagged to a different source. The attribution needs correcting on the segment.
  2. The passage is in the text but was never marked as a quote. The segment needs SegmentFormat=Quote and a QuoteSource.
  3. The identification was provisional. The hand-written list recorded a probable source that the alignment work did not confirm.

Case 3 is not a defect. The hand-written list was built from scholarship, and an identification that the segmentation does not bear out is worth recording as such rather than quietly dropping.

The archived list is preserved in full at Texts Cited in Śikṣāsamuccaya/Archive 2026-08.

Related