Sources:
अस्वामिकानि दुःखानि सर्वाण्येवाविशेषतः। दुःखत्वादेव वार्याणि नियमस्तत्र किंकृतः॥
All sorrow without exception lacks a possessor. It is only because sorrow is sorrow that it should be avoided; why do you imagine then that the sorrow you must allay is limited to your own?[p.429]How to Be a Bodhisattva: Introduction to the Practice of the Bodhisattva Path (The Bodhicaryāvatāra)
Gómez, Luis O., trans. "How to Be a Bodhisattva: Introduction to the Practice of the Bodhisattva Path (The Bodhicaryāvatāra)." In Norton Anthology of World Religions: Buddhism, edited by Donald S. Lopez Jr., 395–441. New York: Norton, 2017.
སྡུག་བསྔལ་བདག་པོ་མེད་པར་ནི། །
ཐམས་ཅད་བྱེ་བྲག་མེད་པ་ཉིད། ། སྡུག་བསྔལ་ཡིན་ཕྱིར་དེ་བསལ་བྱ། །
ངེས་པས་དིར་ནི་ཅི་ཞིག་བྱ། །Suffering has no “possessor,”
Therefore no distinctions can be made in it. Since pain is pain, it is to be dispelled.
What use is there in drawing boundaries?[p.124]The Way of the Bodhisattva (2006)Blankleder, Helena, and Wulstan Fletcher (Padmakara Translation Group), trans. The Way of the Bodhisattva: A Translation of the Bodhicharyāvatāra. By Śāntideva. Rev. ed. Shambhala Classics. Boston: Shambhala Publications, 2006.
La souffrance n’ayant pas de propriétaire
N’est celle de personne en particulier. C’est parce qu’elle est souffrance qu’il faut l’éliminer :
À quoi bon spécifier ?
El sufrimiento no tiene un propietario,
por eso en él no hay diferencias. He de eliminarlo porque es sufrimiento.
¿Para qué trazar límites?
Without a possessor of suffering
Everything is without distinction
Because it is suffering, it is to be eliminated.What use is this definiteness here?
Since there is no experiencer of suffering,
There is no difference at all. Because it is suffering, it should be dispelled.
As this is certain, why not act?
སྡུག་བསྔལ་བདག་པོ་མེད་པར་ནི། །
ཐམས་ཅད་བྱེ་བྲག་མེད་པ་ཉིད། ། སྡུག་བསྔལ་ཡིན་ཕྱིར་དེ་བསལ་བྱ། །
ངེས་པས་དེར་ནི་ཅི་ཞིག་བྱ། །
