Chapter 13: Mindfulness

From Bodhicitta
< ArticlesArticles/Chapter 13: Mindfulness

🤓 Admin Zone 🛠️ hidden to non-admins
Chapter 13: Mindfulness
Article
SSC Chapter Summaries


Editorial content: This page was written or translated by the Tsadra Foundation staff as part of the editorial project of this website. It is original content written or translated for the Bodhicitta Project.
Abstract
This chapter explores the practice of mindfulness of body, sensations, mind, and phenomena, emphasizing their impermanent, empty, and illusory nature through extensive citations from various sūtras. Śāntideva uses reductive analysis and numerous analogies to demonstrate that all phenomena, including the body and mind, lack true essence and exist only as interdependent processes, while maintaining that bodhisattvas should cultivate compassion even while recognizing this ultimate emptiness.
Citation
Phuntsho, Karma. "Chapter 13: Mindfulness." Śikṣāsamuccaya in-depth chapter overviews. Bodhicitta: A Tsadra Foundation Initiative, September 2, 2025.

Having purified the mind and made it pliable, one must apply the mind to the practice of mindfulness. The first of the four practices of mindfulness is the mindfulness of the body, which was partly covered in the preceding chapter while discussing the repulsiveness and impurity of the body. Delving further into the mindfulness of the body, Śāntideva cites The Compendium of Dharma Sūtra (Dharmasaṃgītisūtra)) to argue how a bodhisattva must mentally dissect and break down the body into many parts and see the body as merely an assembly of many parts and empty of true nature. "Thinking this body is like space, one must remain in mindfulness of space and see everything as space,"[1] states the sūtra. There is no beginning, end, middle, base, owner, and no real thing as body, aggregate, enjoyment, habitat, foundation, and sense-fields. They are mere labels, and the body has no essence. Moreover, it is a repulsive and impure thing and a nest of hundreds of illnesses.

Śāntideva makes the same point in a long citation from The Questions of the Vīradatta (Vīradattaparipṛcchāsūtra) using numerous analogies. The body is compared to an empty house with nine doors, an anthill haunted by snakes, a bad friend, a jealous monkey, a fleeting bubble, a deceptive mirage, a pithless plantain tree, a misleading magical illusion, a demanding king, an opportunistic thief, a hateful enemy, an indifferent stranger, a murderer, etc. Each of these and other analogies are used to illustrate the transient, unreliable, deceptive, and demanding nature of the body and how meaningless it is to be attached to the body. The body is a bag of impurity and of 84000 kinds of worms and microbes, which ooze out of the nine orifices.

As the body is a fleeting thing that is bound to end in death, The Jewel Crest Sūtra (Ratnacūḍasūtra) recommends getting the best out of it, or "extracting the essence" of one's body, possessions, and livelihood. One does so by thinking of the impermanent nature of the body and using it as a servant of sentient beings, not engaging in any negative bodily actions, not craving for enjoyments but giving them away, and wishing to use one's body to turn the bodies of all sentient beings into the bodies of enlightened buddhas.

To discuss the next topic of mindfulness of sensation, Śāntideva cites The Jewel Crest Sūtra, which states that a bodhisattva who is meditating on the mindfulness of sensation will generate compassion toward even those beings experiencing a pleasant or blissful sensation, for true bliss or pleasure is the state of being without sensation. A bodhisattva must experience any kind of sensation—blissful, painful, or neutral—with a sense of compassion. When they experience pleasure, they should cultivate compassion toward sentient beings engaged in attachment and work to eliminate the tendencies of attachment. When they experience suffering, they should cultivate compassion toward sentient beings engaged in aversion and work to eliminate the tendencies of aversion. And when they experience neither pleasure nor pain, they should cultivate compassion toward sentient beings engaged in ignorance and work to eliminate the tendencies of ignorance. They should not be attached to pleasant sensation, averse to painful sensation, or indifferent to neutral sensation but destroy attachment, aversion, and ignorance. They should know pleasant sensations to be impermanent, unpleasant ones to be dissatisfactory, and neither pleasant nor unpleasant ones to be lacking self.

The Teachings of Akṣayamati Sūtra (Akṣayamatinirdeśasūtra) instructs a bodhisattva to generate compassion toward beings in suffering when they encounter unpleasant sensations and to recognize that sensation leads to attachment, craving, grasping, apprehension, and wrong thoughts. The Compendium of Dharma Sūtra recommends that a bodhisattva see that there is no one having the sensation in reality. A wise person must abide in the mindfulness of sensation, seeing it as peaceful and luminous, like the state of enlightenment itself.

Śāntideva's presentation of the mindfulness of the mind involves a very reductive and deconstructive approach. He quotes The Heap of Jewels Sūtra, which asks what the mind afflicted by attachment, aversion, or ignorance really is. Does it exist in the past, present, or the future? Mind cannot be from the past, as what is past has ceased to exist. It cannot be from the future, as what is in the future is yet to exist. And it cannot be in the present, as there is no present that remains. Mind is not outside, inside, or both. It is not form, visible, tangible, dependable, cognizable, or knowable. The buddhas have not seen, do not see, and will not see it. It is the mere creation of a mistaken notion. The sūtra uses many analogies, such as magical illusion, waterfall, wind, light, space, lightning, sandcastle, and dream, to illustrate the nonessentiality and futility of the mind.

"O Kāśyapa! You cannot find the mind even if you look everywhere," claims the Buddha in this sūtra, "and what cannot be found is inapprehensible and beyond the three times."[2] It is therefore neither existent nor nonexistent. The Jewel Crest Sūtra also investigates the existence of mind by looking outside, inside, in the aggregates, elements, and sense-fields, and cannot find any mind in them. If apprehension or fixation generates the mind or consciousness, what is apprehension? "Is it one with the mind or different?" asks the sūtra to conclude that both options are not tenable.[3] The reductive analyses found in the sūtras that Śāntideva cites here are also succinctly presented in his Way of the Bodhisattva while discussing the mindfulness of the mind.

The same kind of reductive analysis is used in establishing the points for the mindfulness of all phenomena. According to The Teachings of Akṣayamati Sūtra, a bodhisattva who sees phenomena as they are will see no phenomena, no buddhas, buddhahoods, paths, freedoms, or bondages. Yet, as things appear, such a bodhisattva will generate compassion for sentient beings and perceive all phenomena, including afflictive emotions, like a magical illusion, for in reality there are no afflictive emotions, no aggregates, no attachment, no aversion, and no ignorance. Such a bodhisattva will maintain the mindfulness of the fact that the nature of afflictive emotions is exactly the nature of enlightenment.

In maintaining the mindfulness of phenomena, The Jewel Crest Sūtra focuses on the point that there is no self-existence, being, soul, person, or individual who is being born, dying, or moving apart from the process of arising and ceasing phenomena. This is the reality of things that should be realized while also maintaining the thought of bodhicitta. The Play in Full Sūtra gives many similes, including an unfired clay pot, sandcastle, light rays, wind, bubble, plantain tree, and magical illusion to show the nonessentiality and ephemerality of all phenomena, although the childish world perceives them as real and permanent. Things arise from causes and conditions, like the sprout arising from the seed and like a clay image from a mold. The seed does not become the sprout, but the sprout cannot be without the seed. The mold is not transferred to the clay image, but the clay image emerges from the mold. It is a fleeting and illusory process of dependent-arising, and this applies to all conditioned phenomena. A flame can arise from the convergence of two twigs and the effort of the hand, but it dies when the causes cease to exist. Yet, if a wise person investigates from where the flame has come and where it has gone, it cannot be found. There is no real coming or going, production or cessation, apprehension or cognition. This is the main point of the mindfulness of phenomena.


  1. ↑ Derge Tanjur, Khi, f. 128b ལུས་འདི་ནི་ནམ་མཁའ་དང་མཚུངས་སོ་སྙམ་ནས་དེ་ལུས་ལ་ནམ་མཁའ་ལྟར་དྲན་པ་ཉེ་བར་འཇོག་གོ། །དེ་ཐམས་ཅད་ནམ་མཁའ་ལྟར་མཐོང་ངོ་། །
  2. ↑ Derge Tanjur, Khi, f. 131a: འོད་སྲུང་། སེམས་ནི་ཀུན་ཏུ་བཙལ་ཀྱང་མི་རྙེད་དོ། །གང་མི་རྙེད་པ་འདི་ནི་མི་དམིགས་པའོ། །གང་མི་དམིགས་པ་འདི་ནི་འདས་པ་ཡང་མ་ཡིན་མ་འོངས་པ་ཡང་མ་ཡིན་ད་ལྟར་བྱུང་བ་ཡང་མ་ཡིན་ནོ།། གང་འདས་པ་ཡང་མ་ཡིན་མ་འོངས་པ་ཡང་མ་ཡིན་ད་ལྟར་བྱུང་བ་ཡང་མ་ཡིན་པ་དེ་ནི་དུས་གསུམ་ལས་ཡང་དག་པར་འདས་པའོ།། གང་དུས་གསུམ་ལས་ཡང་དག་པར་འདས་པ་དེ་ནི་ཡོད་པ་ཡང་མ་ཡིན་མེད་པ་ཡང་མ་ཡིན་ནོ།།
  3. ↑ See Karma Phuntsho, ed., རྒྱལ་སྲས་ཞི་བ་ལྷའི་གསུང་རྩོམ་བཞུགས་སོ།། The Written Works of Śāntideva (Bhutan: Loden Foundation, 2026), 234.
Interconnections
1 Scholarship on
Shantideva high res brighter cropped.jpg
Classical WorksAbout this item
Śikṣāsamuccaya (T. Bslab pa kun las btus pa; C. Dasheng ji pusa xue lun; J. Daijōjū bosatsugakuron; K. Taesǔng chip posal hak non 大乘集菩薩學論). In Sanskrit, "Compendium of Training," a work by the eighth-century Indian Mahāyāna master Śāntideva. It consists of twenty-seven stanzas on the motivation and practice of the bodhisattva, including bodhicitta, the six perfections (pāramitā), the worship of buddhas and bodhisattvas, the benefits of renunciation, and the peace derived from the knowledge of emptiness (śūnyatā). The topic of each of the stanzas receives elaboration in the form of a prose commentary by the author as well as in illustrative passages, often quite extensive, drawn from a wide variety of Mahāyāna sūtras. Some ninety-seven texts are cited in all, many of which have been lost in their original Sanskrit, making the Śikṣāsamuccaya an especially important source for the textual history of Indian Buddhism. These citations also offer a window into which sūtras were known to a Mahāyāna author in eighth-century India. The digest of passages that Śāntideva provides was repeatedly drawn upon by Tibetan authors in their citations of sūtras. Although Śāntideva's Bodhicaryāvatāra and Śikṣāsamuccaya both deal with similar topics, the precise relation between the two texts is unclear. Several of the author's verses appear in both texts and some of the sūtra passages from the Śikṣāsamuccaya also appear in the Bodhicaryāvatāra. One passage in the Bodhicaryāvatāra also refers readers to the Śikṣāsamuccaya, but this line does not occur in the Dunhuang manuscript of the text and may be a later interpolation. (Source: "Śikṣāsamuccaya." In The Princeton Dictionary of Buddhism, 821. Princeton University Press, 2014. http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt46n41q.27.)