Chapter 11: Praise of Wilderness

From Bodhicitta
< ArticlesArticles/Chapter 11: Praise of Wilderness

🤓 Admin Zone 🛠️ hidden to non-admins
Chapter 11: Praise of Wilderness
Article
SSC Chapter Summaries


Editorial content: This page was written or translated by the Tsadra Foundation staff as part of the editorial project of this website. It is original content written or translated for the Bodhicitta Project.
Abstract
Chapter 11 of the Śikṣāsamuccaya emphasizes the importance of renouncing householder life for solitary practice in the wilderness, citing various sūtras to highlight how solitude facilitates spiritual development by reducing worldly distractions and enabling the cultivation of virtues necessary for enlightenment. Śāntideva stresses that true renunciation involves not just physical isolation but complete nonattachment to self and phenomena, while maintaining awareness that one's practice is witnessed by buddhas and spiritual beings even in solitude.
Citation
Phuntsho, Karma. "Chapter 11: Praise of Wilderness." Śikṣāsamuccaya in-depth chapter overviews. Bodhicitta: A Tsadra Foundation Initiative, September 2, 2025.

Chapter 11 begins with an exhortation to reflect on the flaws of a householder's life and live in solitude. Śāntideva cites The Moon Lamp Sūtra (Candrapradīpasūtra, aka Samādhirājasūtra) to point out the problems associated with a householder's life and the advantages of living in solitude to seek enlightenment. If, for reasons of attachment to followers and material gain and so forth, one cannot leave behind the worldly life, the sūtra highlights the problems of association with the unreliable, fickle, and childish worldly people and the peace and happiness one can find in solitude, where there is no one whom one likes or dislikes. The messages conveyed by the verses Śāntideva quotes from this sūtra are also very eloquently presented in the seventh chapter of his Way of the Bodhisattva.

The benefits of living in the wilderness, the sūtra continues, are having fewer worldly occupations, having no conflicts, being able to think of impermanence, having no desires, having afflictive emotions under control, restraining one's body, speech, and mind, being aligned to liberation, and eventually reaching the state of liberation. Living alone like a rhino will quickly lead to attainment of meditative stabilization. The citations from The Questions of Rāṣṭrapāla Sūtra (Rāṣṭrapālaparipṛcchāsūtra) reiterate the same benefits and add that a hermit in solitude will have no pleasure in gain or displeasure in loss and can pursue the six perfections with a mind firm like a diamond.

Śāntideva cites The Questions of Ugraḥ Sūtra (Gṛhapatyugraparipṛcchāsūtra) and also The Jewel Heap Sūtra (Ratnakūṭasūtra) to make the point that if one, after having obtained this human birth and learned and studied a great deal of Dharma, does not put one's knowledge into practice to purify the mind, one would be deceiving the world. It would be like a man who is tormented by thirst while drowning in the sea. Thus, in order to practice Dharma, one must abide in the wilderness, which is neither too close nor too far for one to come and collect alms. The place should be spacious, not too steep, quiet, easy to access, have good clean water and soil, and have trees, flowers, and fruits but no ferocious beasts. At such a place, one must recite sūtras and practice meditation without distraction or dozing off to sleep.

Should someone such as a king, minister, Brahmin, or some others visit the hermitage in the wilderness, the sūtras give instructions on how the hermit bodhisattva should interact with them by including words of greetings and seating etiquette. The Questions of Ugraḥ Sūtra underlines the point that living in the wilderness does not by itself make someone a śramaṇa, or virtuous ascetic, for even deer, monkeys, birds, thieves, and outcasts live in the wilderness. Having examined why one has come to the wilderness, one must fulfill the qualities of a virtuous practitioner. An ascetic bodhisattva goes to the wilderness out of fear of distractions, company, attachment, hatred, ignorance, pride, cover-up, clinging, jealousy, stinginess, form, sound, smell, taste, touch, evil forces, wrong views, self-love, rebirth, and so forth. One must think it is useless to be in the wilderness if one clings to the self, holds on to the self, grasps at the self, recognizes the self, talks about the self, views the self, abides in the self, thinks of the self, protects the self, or clings to what belongs to the self, holds on to what belongs to the self, and so forth.

One should also not cling, hold on to, grasp, or view others. To abide in the wilderness or solitude is to abide in nothing and nowhere, to abide without clinging, without grasping, and without relying on form, sound, smell, taste, touch, and phenomena. It is to see everything with equanimity and tranquility, to live with contentment, to escape from afflictive emotions, and to seek full liberation. A bodhisattva renunciate must remain in the wilderness without fear, just as grass, bushes, and trees remain without fear. Knowing that there is no real self or person, one must not have fear, and one must also have no attachment to the surroundings and remain without any afflictive emotions.

Having gained firm grounding and mastery in virtuous actions, a bodhisattva must teach Dharma in palaces, villages, towns, and cities. The Questions of Ugraḥ Sūtra also teaches how a bodhisattva must behave if he goes out to receive or give teachings in the midst of other people. It also broaches how a bodhisattva should act without fear in the case of encountering a snake, a ferocious wild beast, a nonhuman spirit, or a celestial deity. A bodhisattva must reflect on how the grass, stumps, bushes, and trees come and go without any creator or external effort but depending on the convergence of the right causes and conditions and how they lack arising and ceasing in the ultimate sense. A bodhisattva must be aware that, having come to live in solitude, they are without any human company to serve as a reminder of right and wrong conduct, yet they are constantly seen and their thoughts noticed by gods, nāgas, yakṣas, gandharvas, and the buddhas. Indeed, if one were to give in to negative thoughts such as desire and malice, one would be no different from people pursuing distractions in busy settlements. One would be letting down the buddhas and nonhuman spirits, who support virtue. Thus, it is important, the sūtra notes, to cultivate the thought to conduct oneself appropriately in order to avoid harm and criticism and please the buddhas.



Interconnections
1 Scholarship on
Shantideva high res brighter cropped.jpg
Classical WorksAbout this item
Śikṣāsamuccaya (T. Bslab pa kun las btus pa; C. Dasheng ji pusa xue lun; J. Daijōjū bosatsugakuron; K. Taesǔng chip posal hak non 大乘集菩薩學論). In Sanskrit, "Compendium of Training," a work by the eighth-century Indian Mahāyāna master Śāntideva. It consists of twenty-seven stanzas on the motivation and practice of the bodhisattva, including bodhicitta, the six perfections (pāramitā), the worship of buddhas and bodhisattvas, the benefits of renunciation, and the peace derived from the knowledge of emptiness (śūnyatā). The topic of each of the stanzas receives elaboration in the form of a prose commentary by the author as well as in illustrative passages, often quite extensive, drawn from a wide variety of Mahāyāna sūtras. Some ninety-seven texts are cited in all, many of which have been lost in their original Sanskrit, making the Śikṣāsamuccaya an especially important source for the textual history of Indian Buddhism. These citations also offer a window into which sūtras were known to a Mahāyāna author in eighth-century India. The digest of passages that Śāntideva provides was repeatedly drawn upon by Tibetan authors in their citations of sūtras. Although Śāntideva's Bodhicaryāvatāra and Śikṣāsamuccaya both deal with similar topics, the precise relation between the two texts is unclear. Several of the author's verses appear in both texts and some of the sūtra passages from the Śikṣāsamuccaya also appear in the Bodhicaryāvatāra. One passage in the Bodhicaryāvatāra also refers readers to the Śikṣāsamuccaya, but this line does not occur in the Dunhuang manuscript of the text and may be a later interpolation. (Source: "Śikṣāsamuccaya." In The Princeton Dictionary of Buddhism, 821. Princeton University Press, 2014. http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt46n41q.27.)