Living Traditions of Practice: Bodhicitta and Vegetarianism
Buddhism's teachings on compassion and non-harm are among its most recognizable features, and yet many practitioners regularly eat meat. The question of diet has a long and complex history within Buddhism, and the tradition has never spoken with a single voice on the matter. In the Pāli canon, the Buddha permitted monastics to eat meat under certain conditions—most notably that they had no knowledge or suspicion of an animal being killed specifically for them—and declined to make vegetarianism a monastic rule. Later Mahāyāna texts, particularly the Laṅkāvatārasūtra and Mahāparinirvāṇasūtra, took a considerably stronger position, arguing that meat eating is incompatible with the bodhisattva's universal compassion, and this became the doctrinal foundation for the strict vegetarianism practiced in Chinese and Vietnamese Buddhist monasticism. Throughout Buddhist history, teachers have continued to return to this question—from classical Indian sūtras to Tibetan masters such as Shabkar Tsokdruk Rangdrol—arguing that genuine compassion cannot be selectively applied. The general attitude of Buddhist communities has nonetheless been shaped by historical, geographical, and cultural factors that vary from tradition to tradition, most notably in Tibet, where the extreme altitude and climate made cultivation of crops across vast areas impossible, giving rise to a culture in which meat eating became both practical necessity and deep-rooted custom. The materials gathered here are an invitation to revisit this question—through classical Buddhist sources, the writings and teachings of contemporary masters, and the reflections of practitioners who have grappled with it firsthand.
The Debate over Vegetarianism in Tibet
For centuries, meat has been woven into Tibetan diet, medicine, ritual, and social life. Yet for practitioners of a tradition whose ethical center is compassion for all sentient beings, this fact has generated persistent unease. Whether a Buddhist monk or layperson, tantric adept or Vinaya observer may or must refrain from meat is a question that has occupied Tibetan thinkers across many generations, and it remains an issue in contemporary times.
The canonical record itself offers no single answer. The Vinaya's rule of "threefold purity"—which holds that meat is permissible if the consumer did not kill the animal, did not request its killing, and had no reason to suspect it was killed on their behalf—provided one basis for defending meat consumption, while the Laṅkāvatārasūtra explicitly challenged such reasoning, implicating the consumer in the animal's death regardless of personal distance from the act. Tibetan masters built elaborate positions on these foundations, arriving at conclusions that range widely: vegetarianism as moral imperative, as personal ideal, as unnecessary burden, or as a practice reserved for the exceptionally realized.
Some of the tradition's most celebrated figures came down firmly on the side of abstention. The Bön master Metön Sherab Özer, the Sakya luminary Ngorchen Kunga Sangpo, the Jonang founder Dolpopa Sherab Gyaltsen, and—perhaps most memorably—the wandering yogin Shabkar Tsokdruk Rangdröl each made the case for vegetarianism through different means: monastic discipline, doctrinal argument, and, in Shabkar's case, vivid verse that pressed directly on the reader's compassion. The Nyingma master Jikmé Lingpa offered something closer to a meditation on animal suffering than a scholastic treatise, asking practitioners to imagine, in the most concrete terms, the fear of a creature about to be slaughtered.
Equally sophisticated were those who argued the other side, among them the Geluk scholar Khedrupjé Gelek Palsang, who maintained that meat consumption is morally permissible for monastics and that the Laṅkāvatārasūtra's stricter prohibitions were addressed to a specific class of bodhisattva rather than the community at large. The cultural pressures that have sustained meat-eating also deserve attention: a medical tradition that framed meat as a physiological necessity, a climate that made plant-based diets genuinely difficult for part of the year, and social values linking meat to wealth, strength, and vitality. The sources gathered here trace these arguments from their earliest expressions to contemporary teachers who continue to wrestle with the question.
Reevaluating Our Relationship with All Beings
Wulstan Fletcher, member of the Padmakara Translation Group and long-time Buddhist practitioner, presents a personal reflection on the complex relationship between the bodhisattva path and meat consumption. He observes that while Tibet's extreme geography historically necessitated a meat-based diet, this practice often persists among Westerners and Tibetans living abroad. While Fletcher is careful not to criticize individual choices—acknowledging medical, social, or personal factors—he points out that scriptural authorities such as Śāntideva and various Mahāyāna sūtras strongly advocate for abstinence as the "default position" of the tradition. He encourages a gradual "noble change" in mindset, suggesting that even if practitioners cannot immediately adopt vegetarianism, they should remain aware of the significant suffering inherent in modern industrial farming. Simply acknowledging the importance of compassion for all beings and maintaining a "general sensitivity" to animal suffering is a vital step in the gradual progress of the bodhisattva way.
Featured Books
Vegetarianism is an important topic of debate in Buddhist circles—some argue that Buddhists should avoid meat entirely while others suggest that it is acceptable. For the most part, however, this ethical query has been conducted in the West without consulting traditional literature on the subject. The Faults of Meat brings together for the first time a collection of rich and intricate explorations of authoritative Tibetan views on eating meat. These fourteen nuanced texts, ranging from scholastic treatises to poetic verse, reveal vegetarianism as a significant, ongoing issue of debate for Tibetans across time and traditions, with a wide variety of voices marshaled against meat, and a few in favor. Authors include many important Tibetan teachers:
Dolpopa Sherab Gyaltsen (1292–1361) Khedrup Jé (1385–1438) The eighth Karmapa, Mikyö Dorjé (1507–1554) Shabkar Tsokdrük Rangdröl (1781–1851) Khenpo Tsultrim Lodrö (1961– ) and many more.
These Buddhist teachers recognize both the ethical problems that surround meat eating and the practical challenges of maintaining a vegetarian diet; their skilled arguments are illuminated further by the translators’ introductions to each work.
The perspectives in The Faults of Meat are strikingly relevant to our discussions of vegetarianism today; they introduce us to new approaches and solutions to a contentious issue for Buddhists. (Source: Wisdom Publications)His Holiness the Fourteenth Dalai Lama, Tenzin Gyatso, has read through Geshe Soepa's explanation and said "It is well written. It would be nice if more equally useful texts were written for people to read."
Protecting the Lives of Helpless Beings is a must-read for all Buddhists and especially for those who wish to support and advocate for vegetarianism. A proponent of animal welfare, Geshe Thubten Soepa has taught extensively on the subject of vegetarianism. (Source Accessed May 2, 2026)Featured Articles
But another phenomenon is taking place at the same time; a movement launched by high clerics in Eastern Tibet which is a firm desire to affirm, in what can be described as an emergent Tibetan Buddhist fundamentalism, a strong sense of Tibetaness. This movement that started some decades ago knew a new impetus after the demonstrations of 2008 that spread all over the Tibetan Plateau. The main religious figure in this movement was Khempo Jigme Phuntsok (Mkhan po 'Jigs med phun tshogs, 1933-2004), the charismatic head of themonastic camp of Larung Gar (Bla rung sgar). Several articles have been written on his life and work. But many other monastics have contributed to this movement which is based on a new set of Ten Virtues: 1) not to butcher and sell meat; 2) not to steal and rob; 3) not to fight with weapons; 4) not to prostitute one's body; 5) not to sell guns and opium; 6) not to smoke opium or cigarettes; 7) not to drink alcohol; 8) not to gamble; 9) not to hunt and 10) not to wear skin and fur of animals. The subject has ignited the web to the point that the website Tibet Web Digest called the new Ten Virtues "the most debated topic on Tibetan blogs last year." Some researchers have already started to deal with the subject and published on it.
In the following pages, I would simply like to add a small piece of work dedicated to Elliot Sperling on this topic. Elliot Sperling is, of course, well-known for his work as a historian of Tibet and Sino-Tibetan relationships, but his passion for contemporary history and his concern for the Tibetan situation are also strong, and have made him one of the few outspoken researchers on the subject, even when expressing his views has come at the cost of his personal interest. This is why he might be curious about an article published by Jamyang Kyi ('Jam dbyangs skyid) arguing against vegetarianism, which appeared on June 24th, 2013 on the blog of the famous writer Sangdor. His blog having recently been shut down, this article is no longer accessible. My aim is thus to provide here a translation of this article and some comments. (Buffetrille, "A Controversy on Vegetarianism," 113–14)
At the same time, however, the Buddha is the extraordinary support for practice, and this free and favored human life is difficult to obtain. Eating meat supports long life, making it necessary for obtaining the supreme objective.”
Featured Multimedia



Bibliography: Works on Animals and Vegetarianism


