| 🤓 Admin Zone 🛠️ hidden to non-admins | |
Description
- Mahāparinirvāṇasūtra (RKTSK 119)
- Mahāparinirvāṇasūtra (RKTSK 120)
- Mahāparinirvāṇasūtra (RKTSK 121)
The Mahāparinirvāṇasūtra is one of the main scriptural sources for buddha-nature in China and Tibet. Set around the time of Buddha's passing or Mahāparinirvāṇa, the sūtra contains teachings on buddha-nature equating it with the dharmakāya—that is, the complete enlightenment of a buddha. It also asserts that all sentient beings possess this nature as the buddhadhātu, or buddha-element, which thus acts as a cause, seed, or potential for all beings to attain enlightenment. Furthermore, the sūtra includes some salient features related to this concept, such as the single vehicle and the notion that the dharmakāya is endowed with the four pāramitās of permanence, bliss, purity, and a self.
It may be noted that there are three different texts with similar titles in the Chinese and Tibetan canons. Of the three Tibetan texts with Mahāparinirvāṇa in their title, a short one (Derge Kangyur, No. 121) called Āryamahāparinirvāṇasūtra contains prophecies of events in the centuries after the Buddha's Mahāparinirvāṇa but has nothing on buddha-nature. Thus, this is not the Mahāparinirvāṇāsūtra which is considered as a Tathāgatagarbhasūtra. The two which deal with buddha-nature are Mahāyānasūtras and contain detailed accounts of the final teachings of the Buddha. The first sūtra, the longer one covering two volumes of Derge Kangyur (mdo sde Nya and Ta) is a translation from Chinese, while the second one is a translation from Sanskrit. They appear to be two different recensions of the same original sūtra as they have similar titles and overlapping content. However, the one translated from Chinese is much longer and also contains information on the events after the Buddha entered Mahāparinirvāṇa.
Recensions
| Sanskrit | महापरिनिर्वाणसूत्र (Mahāparinirvāṇasūtra).
|
|---|---|
| Tibetan |
|
| Chinese |
|
Citations of Related Scholarship
The author, skilled in reading Central Asiatic manuscripts, prepared a critical edition of the Buddist-Sanskrit manuscript of the Mahāparinirvāṇasūtra, but publication was held up because of the war. In the work he collated this manuscript, which was discovered by the Prussian expeditions in Chinese Turkestan, with the Pāli, Chinese, and Tibetan versions. The sūtra describes the last few months before Buddha's death (parinirvāṇa) . Waldschmidt compares the Sanskrit manuscript version with the corresponding printed Pāli texts and the printed Chinese translations. In order to facilitate this comparison, he distinguishes fifty-one events, brought together in six groups, in the last months of Buddha's life, beginning with Minister Varṣākāra's visit to Buddha in Rājagṛha and ending with the cremation of Buddha's body and the distribution of the relics. (Review by Johannes Rahder, Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies 10, no. 2 (1947): 227-29)
The present book is the second part of this work, and deals with the events numbered 32 to 51, all of which took place in Kuśinagara where the Buddha entered parinirvāṇa. Part 1, published in 1944, deals with the events numbered 1 to 31, the arrival in Kuśinagara.The author, skilled in reading Central Asiatic manuscripts, prepared a critical edition of the Buddist-Sanskrit manuscript of the Mahāparinirvāṇasūtra, but publication was held up because of the war. In the work he collated this manuscript, which was discovered by the Prussian expeditions in Chinese Turkestan, with the Pāli, Chinese, and Tibetan versions. The sūtra describes the last few months before Buddha's death (parinirvāṇa) . Waldschmidt compares the Sanskrit manuscript version with the corresponding printed Pāli texts and the printed Chinese translations. In order to facilitate this comparison, he distinguishes fifty-one events, brought together in six groups, in the last months of Buddha's life, beginning with Minister Varṣākāra's visit to Buddha in Rājagṛha and ending with the cremation of Buddha's body and the distribution of the relics. (Review by Johannes Rahder, Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies 10, no. 2 (1947): 227-29)
The present book is the second part of this work, and deals with the events numbered 32 to 51, all of which took place in Kuśinagara where the Buddha entered parinirvāṇa. Part 1, published in 1944, deals with the events numbered 1 to 31, the arrival in Kuśinagara.The MPNS-G declares or suggests the non-emptiness of the tathāgata. This is reinterpretation of the pratītyasamutpāda and the śūnyatā idea, and follows the rule of the historical Buddhist hermeneutics. It is especially worthwhile to note that the MBhS, like the Saṃdhinirmocanasūtra in the Vijñāptimātra idea, devaluates the śūnyatā idea as imperfect. This quite negative attitude toward the śūnyatā idea does not appear in any other Indian texts on the tathāgatagarbha idea including the MPNS and the AMS. Aiming at establishing the theory that every sentient being is able to perform religious efforts and become buddha on account of the nonemptiness and the eternalness of the tathāgata, the MBhS must reject any sūtra concerning the śūnyatā idea as imperfect. Though the MPNS is a pioneer in reinterpretation of the the śúnyatā idea, the MPNS cannot devaluate it perfectly because the śūnyatā idea is one of the main backgrounds to the MPNS. The MBhS's decisive attitude toward the śūnyatā idea devaluation becomes possible by having the MPNS as its basis. (Source: UTokyo Repository)
The author, skilled in reading Central Asiatic manuscripts, prepared a critical edition of the Buddist-Sanskrit manuscript of the Mahāparinirvāṇasūtra, but publication was held up because of the war. In the work he collated this manuscript, which was discovered by the Prussian expeditions in Chinese Turkestan, with the Pāli, Chinese, and Tibetan versions. The sūtra describes the last few months before Buddha's death (parinirvāṇa) . Waldschmidt compares the Sanskrit manuscript version with the corresponding printed Pāli texts and the printed Chinese translations. In order to facilitate this comparison, he distinguishes fifty-one events, brought together in six groups, in the last months of Buddha's life, beginning with Minister Varṣākāra's visit to Buddha in Rājagṛha and ending with the cremation of Buddha's body and the distribution of the relics. (Review by Johannes Rahder, Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies 10, no. 2 (1947): 227-29)
The present book is the second part of this work, and deals with the events numbered 32 to 51, all of which took place in Kuśinagara where the Buddha entered parinirvāṇa. Part 1, published in 1944, deals with the events numbered 1 to 31, the arrival in Kuśinagara.The MPNS-G declares or suggests the non-emptiness of the tathāgata. This is reinterpretation of the pratītyasamutpāda and the śūnyatā idea, and follows the rule of the historical Buddhist hermeneutics. It is especially worthwhile to note that the MBhS, like the Saṃdhinirmocanasūtra in the Vijñāptimātra idea, devaluates the śūnyatā idea as imperfect. This quite negative attitude toward the śūnyatā idea does not appear in any other Indian texts on the tathāgatagarbha idea including the MPNS and the AMS. Aiming at establishing the theory that every sentient being is able to perform religious efforts and become buddha on account of the nonemptiness and the eternalness of the tathāgata, the MBhS must reject any sūtra concerning the śūnyatā idea as imperfect. Though the MPNS is a pioneer in reinterpretation of the the śúnyatā idea, the MPNS cannot devaluate it perfectly because the śūnyatā idea is one of the main backgrounds to the MPNS. The MBhS's decisive attitude toward the śūnyatā idea devaluation becomes possible by having the MPNS as its basis. (Source: UTokyo Repository)
The Buddhist Self is a methodical examination of Indian teaching about the tathāgatagarbha (otherwise the presence of one's “Buddha-nature”) and the extent to which different Buddhist texts and authors articulated this in terms of the self. C. V. Jones attends to each of the Indian Buddhist works responsible for explaining what is meant by the expression tathāgatagarbha, and how far this should be understood or promoted using the language of selfhood. With close attention to these sources, Jones argues that the trajectory of Buddha-nature thought in India is also the history and legacy of a Buddhist account of what deserves to be called the self: an innovative attempt to equip Mahāyāna Buddhism with an affirmative response to wider Indian interest in the discovery of something precious or even divine in one's own constitution. This argument is supplemented by critical consideration of other themes that run through this distinctive body of Mahāyānist literature: the relationship between Buddhist and non-Buddhist teachings about the self, the overlap between the tathāgatagarbha and the nature of the mind, and the originally radical position that the only means of becoming liberated from rebirth is to achieve the same exalted status as the Buddha. (Source: University of Hawai'i Press)
An error occurred during the storage process. Message reads "_https" has not been listed as valid URI scheme.


















