The Ninth Chapter

From Bodhicitta
StudyThe Ninth Chapter
< Study
Revision as of 13:35, 3 September 2025 by GregF (talk | contribs)


The Ninth Chapter
Study


The Main protagonists of the Debates on the Wisdom Chapter

Chapter 9 of Śāntideva's Bodhicaryāvatāra explores the Perfection of Wisdom (prajñāpāramitā) and examining emptiness (śūnyatā) through rigorous philosophical analysis. This chapter sparked centuries of debate within Tibetan Buddhism, particularly between Madhyamaka interpretative schools. Mipham Rinpoche's commentary emphasized the compatibility of Prasaṅgika and Yogācāra views, drawing criticism from Drakar Tulku who defended Tsongkhapa's stricter Prasaṅgika position. Pari Rabsel joined the discourse, questioning aspects of both interpretations and proposing nuanced readings of Śāntideva's intended meaning regarding conventional and ultimate truths in Buddhist soteriology.

Contextualizing the Debates

This article explores and contextualizes the philosophical debates between Mipham Rinpoche, representing the Nyingma tradition, and Geluk scholars like Drakar Tulku and Pari Lobsang Rabsel in 19th century Tibet.

 
Mapping the Debates Between Mipham and Geluk Scholars
Explore key points of contention such as the nature of the two truths, the object of negation in Madhyamaka reasoning, the realization of emptiness by arhats, and the relationship between the six perfections on the bodhisattva path.
 
A Short Introduction to the Wisdom Chapter
This essay provides an overview of the ninth chapter of Śāntideva's Bodhicharyāvatāra, commonly referred to as the Wisdom Chapter.
Resource
 
Mipham's Norbu Ketaka
This section examines the controversy surrounding Mipham Rinpoche's commentary on the "Wisdom Chapter" of the Bodhicaryāvatāra, known as the Ketaka Jewel.
Resource
 
Historical Context and Textual Sources of the Late Nineteenth-Century Debates
This overview provides detailed information on the historical development of the controversy surrounding Mipham's commentary on the Wisdom Chapter
Resource
 
The Debates in the Context of Tibetan Doctrinal Polemics
In this his essay, the author establishes the wider literary and socio-historical background of the debate between 'Ju Mi pham and Dpa' ris Rab gsal.
Resource
 
The Doctrinal Background of the Debates
In the following section, a detailed account of Madhyamaka in Tibet as well as of the hermeneutical issues related to the debates between Mipham and Geluk scholars is provided.
Resource
 
Mipham's Interpretation of Madhyamaka
This section offers a detailed presentation of Mipham's understanding of Madhyamaka and his responses to criticisms from Gelugpa scholars.
Resource
 
The Debate Between Mipham Rinpoche and Drakar Tulku
This essay focuses on Mipham's Light of the DayStar, his response to Drakar Lobzang Palden Tenzin Nyendrak's criticism of his commentary on the ninth chapter of the Bodhicaryāvatāra.
Resource
 
The Debate Between Mipham Rinpoche and Pari Rabsel
This page discusses the debate between Mipham and his contemporary from the Geluk school, Pari Rabsel
Resource