The Two Truths in Indian Buddhism (Thakchoe 2023)
Description
The Vaibhāṣika, Saūtrāntika, Yogācāra, and Madhyamaka schools provide a framework for a continuum of philosophical debate that is far more interrelated, and internally complex, than one may presume. Yet we see how the schools build upon the findings of one another, leading from a belief in the realism of external phenomena to the relinquishment of any commitment to realism of either external or internal realities. This fascinating movement through philosophical approaches leads us to see how the conventional and ultimate—dependent arising and emptiness—are twin aspects of a single reality. (Source: Wisdom Publications)
- Acknowledgmentsix
- Introduction: Mahāyāna and the Two Truths1
- 1. Vaibhāsika: Vasubandhu25
- Conventional Truth29
- Ultimate Truth32
- Conclusion35
- 2. Sautrāntika: Vasubandhu and Dharmakīrti39
- Scripturalists40
- Logicians43
- Ultimate Truth43
- Conventional Truth48
- Conclusion51
- 3. Yogācāra: Vasubandhu53
- Conventional Truth56
- Ultimate Truth60
- The Theory of the Three Naturelessnesses63
- Arguments Rejecting the Reality of External Objects65
- Conclusion72
- 4. Madhyamaka: Nāgārjuna75
- Nāgārjuna’s Theory of the Two Truths76
- The Svātantrika/Prāsaṅgika Splinter79
- Conclusion93
- 5. Sautrāntika-Svātantrika Madhyamaka: Bhāviveka and Jñānagarbha95
- Bhāviveka98
- Jñānagarbha114
- Conclusion124
- 6. Yogācāra-Svātantrika Madhyamaka: Śāntaraksita and Kamalaśīla127
- Ultimate Truth129
- Conventional Truth150
- The Relationship of the Two Truths154
- Conclusion157
- 7. Prāsañgika Madhyamaka: Candrakīrti161
- Conventional Truth162
- Ultimate Truth177
- Conclusion195
- 8. Implications on Contemporary Studies199
- Notes209
- References and Bibliography265
- Index295
- About the Author311
