The Middle Way of the Bodhisattva
Description
Śāntideva is commonly associated with a particular interpretation of the Middle Way philosophy in Tibet, the Prāsaṅgika-Madhyamaka or "Consequence School of the Middle Way." Why might this be the case? Śāntideva's Guide (Bodhicaryāvatāra) clearly does not address a difference between the two types of argument, reductios and independent probative arguments, that form the etymological basis of what distinguishes a Prāsaṅgika ("one who uses consequences") from a Svātantrika ("one who uses independent probative arguments"). So why is Śāntideva's composition considered by Tibetans to be a Prāsaṅgika text?
An answer can be found in how one influential Tibetan author, Künzang Sönam (1823-1905), explains the issue in his nearly 1,000-page commentary on the Guide. In short, he says that "the basis of the debate between Svātantrika and Prāsaṅgika is whether or not there is something that exists on its own" (rang mtshan kyis grub pa).[1] This chapter discusses the role and implications of "existing on its own" as the main principle guiding Künzang Sönam's interpretation of Śāntideva's Guide. For him, this particular feature of the Middle Way conveys the thoroughgoing interdependence that is essential for reaching a proper understanding of Śāntideva's text. In particular, he holds that it is through this interpretation of the Middle Way that Śāntideva maintains a view of emptiness that is compatible with an altruistic ethic. (Duckworth, preliminary remarks, 180)
Notes
- Künzang Sönam, Overview of the Wisdom Chapter, 788; English trans, in The Profound Reality of Interdependence, 211. For further discussion of this topic, see Duckworth, Tibetan Buddhist Philosophy of Mind and Nature, 84-86.