On the Two Kinds of Bodhicitta in the Bhāvanākrama

From Bodhicitta
Articles/On the Two Kinds of Bodhicitta in the Bhāvanākrama

🤓 Admin Zone 🛠️ hidden to non-admins
On the Two Kinds of Bodhicitta in the Bhāvanākrama
Journal Article


Please note that many items in our library are simply pages that represent a detailed library catalog entry and citation of someone else's work, presentation, or performance. Read our General Disclaimer for more information.

Description

This article discusses the concept of bodhicitta (enlightenment mind) as presented in Kamalaśīla's Bhāvanākrama (Stages of Meditation) works. Here's a summary:

The article examines how Kamalaśīla presents two different conceptions of bodhicitta across his writings:

In the first volume of the Bhāvanākrama, bodhicitta is divided into:

Praṇidhicitta (aspiration mind): The initial vow to become a Buddha for all beings
Prasthānacitta (implementation mind): Aspiration accompanied by practice

In the middle volume of the Bhāvanākrama, bodhichitta is instead divided into:

Conventional bodhichitta: Similar to praṇidhicitta - the initial resolution to attain enlightenment
Ultimate bodhichitta: Not a stage of practice but a transcendent state attained through practice

The article also discusses Kamalaśīla's Yogabhāvanāvatāra text, which presents bodhichitta in the same way as the middle volume of Bhāvanākrama, focusing primarily on śamatha (calm-abiding) and vipaśyanā (insight meditation). The author analyzes textual connections between Kamalaśīla's works and Śāntideva's Śikṣāsamuccaya, noting that:

Kamalaśīla's first volume borrows extensively from the Śikṣāsamuccaya's discussion of bodhichitta
While the Śikṣāsamuccaya presents multiple causes for generating bodhichitta, Kamalaśīla critically selects and emphasizes compassion (karuṇā) as the primary cause

The article concludes by clarifying the relationships between these texts and their presentations of the bodhicitta concept in Buddhist meditation practice. (Generated by Claude.ai Apr 11, 2025])

Citation
Asano, Morinobu. "On the Two Kinds of Bodhicitta in the Bhāvanākrama. (In Japanese.) Indogaku Bukkyogaku Kenkyu (Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies) 36, no. 2 (1988): 70–73.
Interconnections
2 Scholarship on
Classical WorksAbout this item
[I]n the first Bhāvanākrama, Kamalaśīla sets forth the three forms of wisdom (prajñā): the wisdom derived from learning (śrutamayīprajñā), the wisdom derived from reflection (cintāmayīprajñā), and the wisdom derived from cultivation (bhāvanāmayīprajñā), explaining that the last of these gradually destroys the afflictive obstructions (kleśāvaraṇa) and the obstructions to omniscience (jñeyāvaraṇa). (Source: "Bhāvanākrama." In The Princeton Dictionary of Buddhism, 113. Princeton University Press, 2014. http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt46n41q.27.)
Classical WorksAbout this item
The second Bhāvanākrama considers many of [the] same topics [as the first], stressing that the achievement of the fruition of buddhahood requires the necessary causes, in the form of the collection of merit (puṇyasaṃbhāra) and the collection of wisdom (jñānasaṃbhāra). Both the first and second works espouse the doctrine of mind only (cittamātra); it is on the basis of these and other statements that Tibetan doxographers classified Kamalaśīla as a Yogācāra-Svātantrika-Madhyamaka. (Source: "Bhāvanākrama." In The Princeton Dictionary of Buddhism, 112–13. Princeton University Press, 2014. http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt46n41q.27.)