Buddhica (La Vallée Poussin 1938)
From Bodhicitta
< ArticlesArticles/Buddhica (La Vallée Poussin 1938)
| 🤓 Admin Zone 🛠️ hidden to non-admins | |
Buddhica
Journal Article
Please note that many items in our library are simply pages that represent a detailed library catalog entry and citation of someone else's work, presentation, or performance. Read our General Disclaimer for more information.
Description
Poussin's "Buddhica" (1938) collects four short philological notes on Buddhist terminology: (1) a defense of Suzuki's reading of a Laṅkāvatāra verse distinguishing scriptural "mode of teaching" from doctrinal truth grasped by personal intuition; (2) a comparison of how Yogācāra thinkers (Hiuan-tsang/Dharmapāla vs. Vasubandhu/Sthiramati) model consciousness's structure; (3) a reconsideration of whether Madhyamaka admits an Absolute, revisiting his earlier debate with Stcherbatsky; and (4) a note on the terms mahāpadeśa and kālāpadeśa, concerning criteria for scriptural authenticity. It was his last publication, appearing shortly after his death.
Citation
La Vallée Poussin, Louis de. "Buddhica." Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies 3, no. 2 (1938): 137–60.
Interconnections
1 Scholarship on
An important Mahāyāna sūtra that was highly influential in East Asia as well as in Nepal, where a manuscript was discovered that remains the only extant Sanskrit recension of this text. It is notable for its inclusion of many doctrinal features that would come to be associated with the Yogācāra philosophy of Mind-Only (Cittamātra), such as the ālayavijñāna, or store-house consciousness, that acts as a repository for the seeds of karmic actions. It also includes several lengthy discussions of tathāgatagarbha and, though it is never actually referenced in the Uttaratantra, it is often listed among the so-called tathāgatagarbha sūtras. While its lack of mention in the Uttaratantra has been interpreted by scholars as evidence that the sūtra postdates the treatise, it should be noted that the ways in which the tathāgatagarbha is discussed in the sūtra is often at odds with its presentation in the Uttaratantra.
