Template:FormModuleMapping: Difference between revisions

From Bodhicitta
((by SublimeText.Mediawiker))
((by SublimeText.Mediawiker))
Line 28: Line 28:
! Bodhicaryāvatāra Chapter and Verse
! Bodhicaryāvatāra Chapter and Verse
{{FormHelp|Enter here the chapter and verse numbers of the Bodhicaryāvatāra to which this work relates, in arabic numerals.}}
{{FormHelp|Enter here the chapter and verse numbers of the Bodhicaryāvatāra to which this work relates, in arabic numerals.}}
| <nowiki>{{{field|BcaChapVerseNum|input type=tokens|values from property=RootTextChapVerseNum|delimiter=;|existing values only|placeholder=List individual verse values}}}</nowiki>
| {{#if: {{#show:{{PAGENAME}}|?RelatedBcaVerse}}
| Following value already entered using deprecated method: '''{{#show:{{PAGENAME}}|?RelatedBcaVerse}}'''<br>
You may enter it below to upgrade the data. It will persist even if you don't.
|
}}<nowiki>{{{field|BcaChapVerseNum|input type=tokens|values from property=RootTextChapVerseNum|delimiter=;|existing values only|placeholder=List individual verse values}}}</nowiki>
Or enter a range:<br>
Or enter a range:<br>
From: <nowiki>{{{field|BcaChapVerseNumRangeStart|input type=text|size=10|placeholder=ex: 1.1}}}</nowiki> to <nowiki>{{{field|BcaChapVerseNumRangeEnd|input type=text|size=10|placeholder=ex: 1.15}}}</nowiki>
From: <nowiki>{{{field|BcaChapVerseNumRangeStart|input type=text|size=10|placeholder=ex: 1.1}}}</nowiki> to <nowiki>{{{field|BcaChapVerseNumRangeEnd|input type=text|size=10|placeholder=ex: 1.15}}}</nowiki>
Line 41: Line 45:
! Approach
! Approach
{{FormHelp|
{{FormHelp|
'''General''' - Does not use discipline specific vocabulary. Often is crafted for a human interest audience and it could be literary writing, journalism, magazine articles, news, podcasts, etc. <br> '''Dharma''' - The writing uses more colloquialisms, sometimes is vague, makes truth claims and uses specific “dharmic” vocabulary and grammar from the writer’s sangha/tradition. It assumes that the reader is a believer to some extent or shares a certain affinity for the shared belief system. Less reflexivity than academic writing and more truth claims are made. Little to no critical analysis of texts, subjects, traditions, etc. <br> '''Traditional''' - This type of content is for an audience that speaks and/or reads '''Tibetan''' and/or Sanskrit (other Buddhist languages could be included) and may have been trained in some traditional system. There is a “Traditional” approach to the topic, including deference to lineage authority, strong truth claims, and uses specific vocabulary and grammar. <br> '''Academic''' - The writing and/or subject is “academic” in nature, meaning the way they write about or interact with the subject is argumentative and uses discipline specific vocabulary and grammar. It’s also theoretical, critical, and historical; it doesn’t presume belief. Truth claims are hedged and contextualized in this manner. Scholarly works based on primary and secondary sources with citations are an obvious example.
'''General''' - Does not use discipline specific vocabulary. Often is crafted for a human interest audience and it could be literary writing, journalism, magazine articles, news, podcasts, etc. <br> '''Dharma''' - The writing uses more colloquialisms, sometimes is vague, makes truth claims and uses specific "dharmic" vocabulary and grammar from the writer’s sangha/tradition. It assumes that the reader is a believer to some extent or shares a certain affinity for the shared belief system. Less reflexivity than academic writing and more truth claims are made. Little to no critical analysis of texts, subjects, traditions, etc. <br> '''Traditional''' - This type of content is for an audience that speaks and/or reads '''Tibetan''' and/or Sanskrit (other Buddhist languages could be included) and may have been trained in some traditional system. There is a "Traditional" approach to the topic, including deference to lineage authority, strong truth claims, and uses specific vocabulary and grammar. <br> '''Academic''' - The writing and/or subject is "academic" in nature, meaning the way they write about or interact with the subject is argumentative and uses discipline specific vocabulary and grammar. It’s also theoretical, critical, and historical; it doesn’t presume belief. Truth claims are hedged and contextualized in this manner. Scholarly works based on primary and secondary sources with citations are an obvious example.
}}
}}
| <nowiki>{{{field|Approach|input type=checkboxes|delimiter=;|values=General;Dharma;Traditional;Academic}}}</nowiki>
| <nowiki>{{{field|Approach|input type=checkboxes|delimiter=;|values=General;Dharma;Traditional;Academic}}}</nowiki>

Revision as of 09:05, 28 May 2024