No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
{{PullBcaVerses|9.110|153}} | {{PullBcaVerses|9.110|153}} | ||
As for the controversial nature of the Wisdom Chapter and its role in inter-tradition scholastic debates in Tibet, Markus Viehbeck explains, | |||
{{QuoteCite | |||
|quote-text=While the actualities of Tibetan Buddhism show manifold cultural influences, the Indian tradition occupies indeed a particularly significant position – as a source of general cultural knowledge, but also as a very concrete authority in terms of particular Buddhist teachings, often in the form of texts, which were translated into Tibetan. In the increasingly specified and technical debates that emerged in the Tibetan Buddhist scholastic traditions, these texts were of fundamental importance: since they represented the authentic Indian tradition, aligning oneself with a text could provide authority to one’s own scholastic elaborations. At the same time, since any text can be read in different ways and its precise meaning needs to be established, usually with the help of commentaries, such texts provided an inexhaustible source for controversial discussion. It is therefore not surprising that many Tibetan commentaries on essential Indian treatises include polemical features in which the texture of a specific scholastic tradition is made explicit against the contours of other traditions, and that such evoked critical reactions from opposing factions. The resulting discourses not only clarify the doctrinal content of individual traditions, but also address to a large extent matters of textual hermeneutics, in the sense that diverging readings are refuted or argued for by using various means of validation. Studying polemical exchanges can therefore not only inform us about Tibetan Buddhist doctrine, but also about the relations between Indian texts and their Tibetan appropriators and the ways in which the latter negotiated these relations among each other. | |||
|source-wiki-page=Polemics in Indo-Tibetan Scholasticism - A Late 19th-Century Debate Between 'Ju Mi pham and Dpa' ris Rab gsal | |||
|page-number=12 | |||
}} | |||