Explore/Translation Issues and Discussions: Difference between revisions

From Bodhicitta
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 10: Line 10:
}}
}}


When the first edition of The Way ofthe Bodhisattva was published in 1997,
When the first edition of The Way of the Bodhisattva was published in 1997,
it was stated that the commentary of the Nyingma master Khenpo Kunzang Pelden (1872-1943) had been consulted for the elucidation of difficult
it was stated that the commentary of the Nyingma master Khenpo Kunzang Pelden (1872-1943) had been consulted for the elucidation of difficult
passages. At the time, a translation into English of that long and important
passages. At the time, a translation into English of that long and important
work was no more than a pious dream. Now, after a wait ofalmost ten years
work was no more than a pious dream. Now, after a wait of almost ten years
and many intervening projects, this task has been completed; and the care¬
and many intervening projects, this task has been completed; and the careful reading and study of the text that it involved prompted us to revisit and
ful reading and study of the text that it involved prompted us to revisit and
overhaul our original version of The Way of the Bodhisattva, correcting
overhaul our original version of The Way of the Bodhisattva, correcting
errors and, where possible, making it a tauter, more literal, reflection ofthe
errors and, where possible, making it a tauter, more literal, reflection of the
Tibetan original. We hope that we have been able to rectify the perhaps
Tibetan original. We hope that we have been able to rectify the perhaps
undue freedom of expression in the earlier rendering that led some of its
undue freedom of expression in the earlier rendering that led some of its
Line 27: Line 26:
Publications for being willing to produce this new edition.
Publications for being willing to produce this new edition.


Since 1997, several other translations of the Bodhicharyävatära have
Since 1997, several other translations of the ''Bodhicharyāvatāra'' have
appeared in English. The first, published just as The Way ofthe Bodhisattva
appeared in English. The first, published just as The Way of the Bodhisattva
was going to press, was made by Kate Crosby and Andrew Skilton directly
was going to press, was made by Kate Crosby and Andrew Skilton directly
from the surviving Sanskrit text. This was followed shortly afterward by
from the surviving Sanskrit text. This was followed shortly afterward by
the translation ofVesna and Alan Wallace, made also from the Sanskrit but
the translation of Vesna and Alan Wallace, made also from the Sanskrit but
with reference to the Tibetan, and with the Tibetan variants given in foot¬
with reference to the Tibetan, and with the Tibetan variants given in footnotes. Later, in 2003, a version was published by Neil Eliott based in the explanations of Geshe Kelsang Gyatso. Most recently, another rendering
notes. Later, in 2003, a version was published by Neil Eliott based in the ex¬
(printed and circulated at the time of His Holiness the Dalai Lama's teaching on the ''Bodhicharyāvatāra'' in Zurich, 2005) was produced by Alexander Berzin, mainly from the Tibetan but revised and corrected in light of the
planations of Geshe Kelsang Gyatso. Most recently, another rendering
Sanskrit. Finally, yet another project to translate Shāntideva's root text and
(printed and circulated at the time of His Holiness the Dalai Lama’s teach¬
ing on the Bodhicharyävatära in Zurich, 2005) was produced by Alexander Berzin, mainly from the Tibetan but revised and corrected in light of the
Sanskrit. Finally, yet another project to translate Shäntideva’s root text and
the commentary by Kunzang Pelden, accompanied by the inestimable
the commentary by Kunzang Pelden, accompanied by the inestimable
explanations of Khenpo Chöga of Shri Simha College in Kham, was inau¬
explanations of Khenpo Chöga of Shri Simha College in Kham, was inaugurated in 2002 by Andreas Kretschmar, who, in an act of great and openhanded generosity, has made his as yet uncompleted work freely available
gurated in 2002 by Andreas Kretschmar, who, in an act of great and openhanded generosity, has made his as yet uncompleted work freely available
on the Internet. All these translations are of the greatest interest, and although, for our interpretation, we have followed Kunzang Pelden in all
on the Internet. All these translations are of the greatest interest, and al¬
though, for our interpretation, we have followed Kunzang Pelden in all
things, in preparing this revised edition, we have diligently compared our
things, in preparing this revised edition, we have diligently compared our
work with the versions just mentioned and gratefully acknowledge the
work with the versions just mentioned and gratefully acknowledge the
help that they have given us.
help that they have given us.


The appearance oftranslations ofthe Bodhicharyävatära made from
The appearance of translations ofthe ''Bodhicharyāvatāra'' made from
the Sanskrit, side by side with others made from the Tibetan, calls into
the Sanskrit, side by side with others made from the Tibetan, calls into
question with renewed force the desirability of translating whât is itself a
question with renewed force the desirability of translating what is itself a
translation, when a manuscript of the text still exists in the original lan¬
translation, when a manuscript of the text still exists in the original language. This is closely connected with another question, which concerns the
guage. This is closely connected with another question, which concerns the
relative merits of study (and by extension, translation) within the environment of secular Western scholarship as contrasted with the traditional setting of a Tibetan monastic college and a teacher-disciple relationship. These two approaches differ considerably both in method and objective.
relative merits of study (and by extension, translation) within the environ¬
The Buddhologist of Western academia aims, through the examination of
ment of secular Western scholarship as contrasted with the traditional set¬
texts, archaeological evidence, and so on, to arrive at a scientifically objective understanding of a religious culture. This is viewed, from outside, as
ting of a Tibetan monastic college and a teacher-disciple relationship.
These two approaches differ considerably both in method and objective.
The Buddhologist ofWestern academia aims, through the examination of
texts, archaeological evidence, and so on, to arrive at a scientifically objec¬
tive understanding of a religious culture. This is viewed, from outside, as
an essentially anthropological phenomenon, the beliefs and practices of
an essentially anthropological phenomenon, the beliefs and practices of
which are described and classified within a discipline that consciously dis¬
which are described and classified within a discipline that consciously distances itself from religious allegiance and practice.1 Buddhists, on the
tances itself from religious allegiance and practice.1 Buddhists, on the
other hand, study the sacred texts as part of a spiritual discipline, intending or at least aspiring to implement the teachings they contain. And to
other hand, study the sacred texts as part of a spiritual discipline, intend¬
ing or at least aspiring to implement the teachings they contain. And to
that end, they attach an equal importance not only to the origins and
that end, they attach an equal importance not only to the origins and
authorship of the texts, but also to the living tradition of explanation
authorship of the texts, but also to the living tradition of explanation
and practice that has preserved them into the present age. These two
and practice that has preserved them into the present age. These two
approaches obviously overlap, in the sense that textual accuracy and cor¬
approaches obviously overlap, in the sense that textual accuracy and correct interpretation are of prime importance for both. Nevertheless, they
rect interpretation are of prime importance for both. Nevertheless, they
diverge in important respects; and it is important to recognize the difference between independent, academic scholarship, with its essentially humanistic interest in texts, as compared with the allegiance to a tradition of spiritual training: detached erudition on the one hand, committed involvement on the other.
diverge in important respects; and it is important to recognize the differ¬
ence between independent, academic scholarship, with its essentially hu¬
manistic interest in texts, as compared with the allegiance to a tradition of spiritual training: detached erudition on the one hand, committed in¬
volvement on the other.


There is no doubt that the findings of Western scholarship in the
There is no doubt that the findings of Western scholarship in the

Revision as of 19:09, 30 October 2023





See Padmakara The Way of the Boddhisattva p.i-xxi

This page will include a discussion on methodological issues related to the translation of the Bodhicaryāvatāra into modern languages. In this discussion, we will identify key points that are particularly relevant for translators of Indian Buddhist treatises.

The titles listed in the bibliography below are useful sources to develop this page. Even if their main focus appears to be on different subject, they have been selected because they include valuable information on the topic of this page.