Śatasāhasrikāprajñāpāramitā

From Bodhicitta
< Texts(Redirected from Texts/RKTSK 8)
Texts/Śatasāhasrikāprajñāpāramitā

🤓 Admin Zone 🛠️ hidden to non-admins
शतसाहस्रिकाप्रज्ञापारमिता
Śatasāhasrikāprajñāpāramitā
ཤེས་རབ་ཀྱི་ཕ་རོལ་ཏུ་ཕྱིན་པ་སྟོང་ཕྲག་བརྒྱ་པ།
shes rab kyi pha rol tu phyin pa stong phrag brgya pa
The Perfection of Wisdom in One Hundred Thousand Lines (84000)
Text


Please note that many items in our library are simply pages that represent a detailed library catalog entry and citation of someone else's work, presentation, or performance. Read our General Disclaimer for more information.

Description

Perfection of Wisdom Sutra in One Hundred Thousand Lines (Skt. Śata-sāhasrikā Prajñāpāramitā; Tib. ཤེར་ཕྱིན་སྟོང་ཕྲག་བརྒྱ་པ།, Wyl. sher phyin stong phrag brgya pa) is the largest of the Prajnaparamita sutras. In Tibetan it is referred to simply as 'The Hundred Thousand' (Tib. འབུམ་, bum, Wyl. 'bum). (Source: Rigpawiki)
Quoted in the aligned translations
Reference
Śatasāhasrikāprajñāpāramitā [शतसाहस्रिकाप्रज्ञापारमिता]. shes rab kyi pha rol tu phyin pa stong phrag brgya pa [ཤེས་རབ་ཀྱི་ཕ་རོལ་ཏུ་ཕྱིན་པ་སྟོང་ཕྲག་བརྒྱ་པ།]. [The Perfection of Wisdom in One Hundred Thousand Lines (84000)]. Translated by Khams pa Go cha, Sbas Mañjuśrī, Nyang Indravaro, Lo chen Vairocana, Lce Khyi-'brug, Ye shes sde, Xuanzang. Kangyur, RKTSK 8 http://www.rkts.org/cat.php?id=8&typ=1.
Interconnections
All 14Books 10Articles 2Classical Works 2
1 Classical commentaries
Vasubandhu-Thangka.jpg
Classical WorksAbout this item
The Long Explanation of the Noble Perfection of Wisdom in One Hundred Thousand, Twenty-Five Thousand, and Eighteen Thousand Lines is a detailed explanation of the Long Perfection of Wisdom sūtras, presenting a structural framework for them that is relatively easy to understand in comparison to most other commentaries based on Maitreya-Asaṅga's Ornament for the Clear Realizations. After a detailed, word-by-word explanation of the introductory chapter common to all three sūtras, it explains the structure they also all share in terms of the three approaches or "gateways"—brief, intermediate, and detailed—ending with an explanation of the passage known as the "Maitreya chapter" found only in the Eighteen Thousand Line and Twenty-Five Thousand Line sūtras. It goes by many different titles, and its authorship has never been conclusively determined, some Tibetans believing it to be by Vasubandhu, and others that it is by Daṃṣṭrāsena. (Source: 84000)
5 Scholarship
Manuscrip Remains of Buddhist Literature Found in Eastern Turkestan 1916-front.jpg
Books1916About this item
Manuscript Remains of Buddhist Literature Found in Eastern Turkestan: Facsimiles with Transcripts, Translations and Notes, Volume I (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1916), edited by A. F. Rudolf Hoernle (1841–1918) "in conjunction with other scholars," presents facsimiles, transcriptions, translations, and scholarly notes for Buddhist manuscript fragments recovered from Central Asian sites—chiefly through Sir Aurel Stein's expeditions, alongside material from Hoernle's own and George Macartney's collections—in Sanskrit, Khotanese, Kuchean, Tibetan, and Chinese. Compiled as a genuinely international collaboration, its contributors included Lionel D. Barnett, Édouard Chavannes, Sten Konow, Sylvain Lévi, Heinrich Lüders, F. E. Pargiter, and F. W. Thomas, each responsible for the material in their specialty. Hoernle's lengthy General Introduction argues, based on the newly recovered Khotanese material, that the Tibetan alphabet derived not directly from India but specifically from the script of Khotan. Though conceived as the first volume of an ongoing series, no further volumes were published. The Sanskrit material includes newly discovered fragments of hymns by the celebrated poet Mātṛceṭa, among other canonical and noncanonical texts.
Articles.jpeg
Articles1913–1918About this item
This article presents the editio princeps of eleven Buddhist manuscript fragments (the "Mannerheim fragments") collected during Baron Gustaf Mannerheim's 1906–1908 expedition through Central Asia, sent to the Finno-Ugrian Society in Helsinki. Nine fragments are in Sanskrit, one in Khotanese, and one is bilingual Sanskrit-Khotanese. Reuter transcribes, restores where possible, and philologically annotates each piece, identifying textual affiliations and discussing orthographic, dialectal, and grammatical peculiarities (Prakritisms, Buddhist Hybrid Sanskrit forms, scribal errors) throughout.

Fragments 1–2 are small, irregularly shaped pieces too damaged to yield a coherent sense or textual identification; Fragment 1 is tentatively judged the oldest of the set on paleographic grounds.

Fragment 3 is rhomboid, in a slanting Gupta script, and represents a discourse between the Buddha and Kāśyapa on the four classes of "false ascetics" (duḥśīlaśīlavatpratirūpakāḥ), correlated with dhūtaguṇa lists in the Dharmasaṃgraha and Mahāvyutpatti.

Fragment 4 is a complete leaf, badly damaged, containing a metrical portion (verses 8–16) dealing with bodhisattvas adorned with the four dharmas, with a partial parallel noted in Mahāvastu II; the prose section on the reverse could not be matched to a known text.

Fragment 5 is identified as a portion of the Saddharmapuṇḍarīka, corresponding to the printed text pp. 40¹⁶–41¹⁴, with the fragment's readings differing only slightly from the edition.

Fragment 6 (Plates III–IV) is identified as a portion of the Suvarṇaprabhāsa, corresponding to parivarta 14 and to p. 68⁹ ff. of Rai Sarat Chandra Śāstri's 1898 edition (Buddhist Texts Society of India, Calcutta). Reuter transcribes and restores the fragment's stanzas (numbered 27–32 in the source), comparing its readings against Śāstri's printed edition line by line and noting divergences in wording, meter, and vocabulary.

Fragment 7 (Plate V) corresponds to a passage in the Śatasāhasrikāprajñāpāramitā, 11th parivarta, but the fragment distributes the same text over two differently-numbered parivartas and shows enough divergence from the printed edition to suggest it belongs to a different manuscript recension, possibly related to Fragment 8.

Fragment 8 (Plate VI) is a complete leaf (numbered 147) closely allied to the Śatasāhasrikāprajñāpāramitā, opening with the bodhisattva Subhūti's questions to the Buddha on the "dream-like" and "illusion-like" nature of phenomena, and possibly forming part of the same textual tradition as Fragment 7, though not the same manuscript.

Fragment 9 (Plate VII) could not be identified with any known text; its general argument concerns the invincibility of an irreversible (avaivartika) bodhisattva's mind against the hosts of Māra, illustrated by the simile of a lapis lazuli gem placed amid glass beads, whose luster the glass cannot eclipse.

Fragment 10 (Plate I) is a small, bilingual Sanskrit-Khotanese piece, difficult to read, containing scattered decipherable words in both languages.

Fragment 11 (Plates VIII–IX) is a Khotanese-language piece naming the otherwise rare bodhisattva Bhaiṣajasena, offering philological comparanda with other known Khotanese Buddhist manuscripts (the Stein collection and the Godfrey manuscripts), and providing material for Reuter's discussion of Khotanese numerals, loanwords from Sanskrit, and verb morphology.
The Prajñāpāramitā Literature-front.jpg
Books2000About this item
The literature of Prajñāpāramitā is vast, deep, and vital to an understanding of the Mahayana. It has so far been neglected by the European scholars. With the aim of facilitating the study, the author has set out a certain amount of information about it. Thus this handbook [was created] for the use of scholars [to record] the very limited knowledge acquired during the last century. (Adapted from Source Nov 28, 2023)
6 A topic of
Manuscrip Remains of Buddhist Literature Found in Eastern Turkestan 1916-front.jpg
Books1916About this item
Manuscript Remains of Buddhist Literature Found in Eastern Turkestan: Facsimiles with Transcripts, Translations and Notes, Volume I (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1916), edited by A. F. Rudolf Hoernle (1841–1918) "in conjunction with other scholars," presents facsimiles, transcriptions, translations, and scholarly notes for Buddhist manuscript fragments recovered from Central Asian sites—chiefly through Sir Aurel Stein's expeditions, alongside material from Hoernle's own and George Macartney's collections—in Sanskrit, Khotanese, Kuchean, Tibetan, and Chinese. Compiled as a genuinely international collaboration, its contributors included Lionel D. Barnett, Édouard Chavannes, Sten Konow, Sylvain Lévi, Heinrich Lüders, F. E. Pargiter, and F. W. Thomas, each responsible for the material in their specialty. Hoernle's lengthy General Introduction argues, based on the newly recovered Khotanese material, that the Tibetan alphabet derived not directly from India but specifically from the script of Khotan. Though conceived as the first volume of an ongoing series, no further volumes were published. The Sanskrit material includes newly discovered fragments of hymns by the celebrated poet Mātṛceṭa, among other canonical and noncanonical texts.
Articles.jpeg
Articles1913–1918About this item
This article presents the editio princeps of eleven Buddhist manuscript fragments (the "Mannerheim fragments") collected during Baron Gustaf Mannerheim's 1906–1908 expedition through Central Asia, sent to the Finno-Ugrian Society in Helsinki. Nine fragments are in Sanskrit, one in Khotanese, and one is bilingual Sanskrit-Khotanese. Reuter transcribes, restores where possible, and philologically annotates each piece, identifying textual affiliations and discussing orthographic, dialectal, and grammatical peculiarities (Prakritisms, Buddhist Hybrid Sanskrit forms, scribal errors) throughout.

Fragments 1–2 are small, irregularly shaped pieces too damaged to yield a coherent sense or textual identification; Fragment 1 is tentatively judged the oldest of the set on paleographic grounds.

Fragment 3 is rhomboid, in a slanting Gupta script, and represents a discourse between the Buddha and Kāśyapa on the four classes of "false ascetics" (duḥśīlaśīlavatpratirūpakāḥ), correlated with dhūtaguṇa lists in the Dharmasaṃgraha and Mahāvyutpatti.

Fragment 4 is a complete leaf, badly damaged, containing a metrical portion (verses 8–16) dealing with bodhisattvas adorned with the four dharmas, with a partial parallel noted in Mahāvastu II; the prose section on the reverse could not be matched to a known text.

Fragment 5 is identified as a portion of the Saddharmapuṇḍarīka, corresponding to the printed text pp. 40¹⁶–41¹⁴, with the fragment's readings differing only slightly from the edition.

Fragment 6 (Plates III–IV) is identified as a portion of the Suvarṇaprabhāsa, corresponding to parivarta 14 and to p. 68⁹ ff. of Rai Sarat Chandra Śāstri's 1898 edition (Buddhist Texts Society of India, Calcutta). Reuter transcribes and restores the fragment's stanzas (numbered 27–32 in the source), comparing its readings against Śāstri's printed edition line by line and noting divergences in wording, meter, and vocabulary.

Fragment 7 (Plate V) corresponds to a passage in the Śatasāhasrikāprajñāpāramitā, 11th parivarta, but the fragment distributes the same text over two differently-numbered parivartas and shows enough divergence from the printed edition to suggest it belongs to a different manuscript recension, possibly related to Fragment 8.

Fragment 8 (Plate VI) is a complete leaf (numbered 147) closely allied to the Śatasāhasrikāprajñāpāramitā, opening with the bodhisattva Subhūti's questions to the Buddha on the "dream-like" and "illusion-like" nature of phenomena, and possibly forming part of the same textual tradition as Fragment 7, though not the same manuscript.

Fragment 9 (Plate VII) could not be identified with any known text; its general argument concerns the invincibility of an irreversible (avaivartika) bodhisattva's mind against the hosts of Māra, illustrated by the simile of a lapis lazuli gem placed amid glass beads, whose luster the glass cannot eclipse.

Fragment 10 (Plate I) is a small, bilingual Sanskrit-Khotanese piece, difficult to read, containing scattered decipherable words in both languages.

Fragment 11 (Plates VIII–IX) is a Khotanese-language piece naming the otherwise rare bodhisattva Bhaiṣajasena, offering philological comparanda with other known Khotanese Buddhist manuscripts (the Stein collection and the Godfrey manuscripts), and providing material for Reuter's discussion of Khotanese numerals, loanwords from Sanskrit, and verb morphology.
The Prajñāpāramitā Literature-front.jpg
Books2000About this item
The literature of Prajñāpāramitā is vast, deep, and vital to an understanding of the Mahayana. It has so far been neglected by the European scholars. With the aim of facilitating the study, the author has set out a certain amount of information about it. Thus this handbook [was created] for the use of scholars [to record] the very limited knowledge acquired during the last century. (Adapted from Source Nov 28, 2023)
Vasubandhu-Thangka.jpg
Classical WorksAbout this item
The Long Explanation of the Noble Perfection of Wisdom in One Hundred Thousand, Twenty-Five Thousand, and Eighteen Thousand Lines is a detailed explanation of the Long Perfection of Wisdom sūtras, presenting a structural framework for them that is relatively easy to understand in comparison to most other commentaries based on Maitreya-Asaṅga's Ornament for the Clear Realizations. After a detailed, word-by-word explanation of the introductory chapter common to all three sūtras, it explains the structure they also all share in terms of the three approaches or "gateways"—brief, intermediate, and detailed—ending with an explanation of the passage known as the "Maitreya chapter" found only in the Eighteen Thousand Line and Twenty-Five Thousand Line sūtras. It goes by many different titles, and its authorship has never been conclusively determined, some Tibetans believing it to be by Vasubandhu, and others that it is by Daṃṣṭrāsena. (Source: 84000)